On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Pablo d'Angelo <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > The idea was that: > > 1. A relative exposure compensation cannot be read from the exif data. > Of course this only applies when hugin does read the images correctly. Hi, I wasn't implying that we read exposure compensation values, I just meant why not just work around 0 as the starting point for any corrections made by Hugin to the image exposure. Basically what happens now when there is no EXIF data available. > > 2. If a "true" hdr needs to be generated, the exposure values of the > camera should be used (unless they are not accurate), because there is > an ambiguity when estimating exposure and response curve at the same time. > I see. I was wondering if that was the case. Thanks for your insight! Best Regards, - Gerry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
