On Jul 27, 3:13 pm, Klaus Foehl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Zoran,
>
> Can confirm this with a 360degrees pano with, say, approx. 18000x2000
> pixels. Vertical line in the sky, about 20% image height, IIRC about
> one pixel wide. Worth slimming the project down, trying to conserve
> the bug with the minimum number of images?
Actually no, I'd like to make my projects bigger not smaller :/
I just calibrated my lens at 52mm and was planning going even higher
res.
BTW this is an old bug, and still no fix or concrete info on it AFAIK.
What gives?
Any advice how to avoid it (without losing resolution?)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
