On Jul 27, 9:27 pm, Zoran Zorkic <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 3:13 pm, Klaus Foehl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello Zoran,
>
> > Can confirm this with a 360degrees pano with, say, approx. 18000x2000
> > pixels. Vertical line in the sky, about 20% image height, IIRC about
> > one pixel wide. Worth slimming the project down, trying to conserve
> > the bug with the minimum number of images?
>
> Actually no, I'd like to make my projects bigger not smaller :/
> I just calibrated my lens at 52mm and was planning going even higher
> res.
>
> BTW this is an old bug, and still no fix or concrete info on it AFAIK.
> What gives?
> Any advice how to avoid it (without losing resolution?)
Oh well, I ran enblend on the remapped photos and no such problems.
Used -a -l 20 -m 1800. C2D win Xp 32bit, 4gb ram, 3.5gb addressable.
I might also add that it ran ~3 times faster with this settings.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
