Yuval Levy kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika sunnuntai, 2. elokuuta 2009): > I think we're almost on the same page for this. In FreeBSD > /usr is the base system and /usr/local is everything that the > user added on top of it, and I like it exactly because "you > can always `rm -rf /usr/local`".
You can't do that any more if any rpm/deb package installs anything in /usr/local or the package management system breaks. (at least rpm does, I don't know the details of dpkg). > Hence I would never publish packages that install somewhere > else but /usr/local. Like Bruno already explained, the above is the reason why you should never publish packages that install anything _in_ /usr/local. Use /opt if you are really opposed to installing in /usr. -- Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@iki.fi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
