I have a similar but more automatic approach. I create the pto project
file for one exposure, and then use a custom script to generate the
panoramas for the different exposures. One feature of nona is very
useful: you can pass the names of the images on the command line and
it will use those images instead of the ones in the pto file. What the
script does is to increase the number in the filename of the images.

An alternative would be to use the "Apply template" in Hugin (in the
File menu), which reuses the settings of another pto file. You could
then use ptomerge
(http://search.cpan.org/dist/Panotools-Script/bin/ptomerge) to merge
these different exposures into one.

Cheers,

Seb

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:16, Eduardo Perez
Esteban<[email protected]> wrote:
> I guess you are doing HDR panoramas, aren't you? Me too, but I take a
> completely different approach: instead of passing all the images to Hugin, I
> make a separate panorama for each exposure, and merge them afterwards; when
> the exposures are aligned, the control points and optimizations can be
> shared, I just change the images.
>
> My workflow is:
>
> * Copy the files from the first exposure to IMG1, IMG2, ..., IMGn (actually,
> I use symbolic links in Linux, but Windows users will probably have to copy
> the files).
> * Open IMG1, IMG2, ..., IMGn with Hugin, create the control points,
> optimize, ...; save the project and create a panorama named PANO1.
> * Now copy the files from the second exposure over IMG1, IMG2, ..., IMGn;
> execute the project again, but save the result to PANO2.
> * Repeat for each exposure, and you will obtain a set of bracketed panoramas
> PANO1, PANO2, ..., PANOn.
> * Do all the HDR work.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:19 AM, RueiKe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I am looking for ways to simplify some of my more complex projects
>> which could be 217 images connected by >10,000 control points.  In
>> these cases I am doing 7 shot brackets for 31 images for full 360 x
>> 180 degree pano.
>>
>> Seems like control points would be greatly simplified if I could just
>> get hugin to assume the bracketed images were already aligned.  I have
>> done a case where I just picked alignment points on the 4 corners of a
>> few photos and it seemed to work fine.  Is this a reasonable
>> approach?  Would it be possible to have an option to add a set of
>> fixed control points for a specified set of aligned images?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rick
>>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to