It isn't the 'mathematical algorithm' that is patented but the novel method for doing something. If it weren't so novel or original, then why didn't someone think of it earlier? It seems most people on this list think that their creations should be protected but the novel thinking of others is meaningless. That seems to be quite self- serving IMHO. You choose to follow the laws that suit you, ignore the rest then expect others to follow the rules.
On Dec 18, 2:59 am, JeCh <[email protected]> wrote: > I would ask a different question. Is it moral to patent a mathematical > algorithm? A don't think it should be patentable and so does the rest > of the world except of USA and maybe Japan. Imagine someone patented > Fourrier transformation... > > If I use Hugin and SIFT based control point generators, I'm not > breaking any law and I don't do anything immoral. > > In fact the patent law is mainly used to slow down invention and > evolution. Except of making less things patentable and for shorter > time, some countries are going the other way we may see soon someone > who will receive a patent for air breathing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
