On Jan 28, 8:07 pm, dmg <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, i guess I just have to click one more time. > > So from what I see, PTmender is not outputing correctly the entire > image? but what it outputs is accurate?
Well, I just rendered another test, and yes the outputs are the same as Nona minus the vignetting correction. I also saved the console output and it's a whooping 92mb log. Here's the first 2k lines: http://pastebin.com/f503eff26 The PTstitcher file: http://pastebin.com/f2bd50a59 > Not many people are using PTmender these days, so there isn't a lot of > testing on it. > But I want to fix the problems. So if we can find a good test case > that shows the bug, I'll take care of it. Tried it on a simple pitch transform (p-90) on a equirectangular image and it's noticeably faster than Nona. Though it only outputted a cropped square in the middle of the pano instead of the whole thing (tried 2 versions of PTmender). The script seems fine to me: p f2 w11922 h5961 v360 n"TIFF c:NONE" m g1 i0 f0 m2 p0.00784314 # output image lines o w11922 h5961 f4 TrX0 TrY0 TrZ0 a0 b0 c0 d0 e0 g0 p-90 r146.30993247402 t0 v360 y-146.30993247402 u10 m0 n"H:\_pano\park \nadir-SMBlend.tif" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
