Thanks Zoran. PTmender is significantly faster than Nona. that is true.
--dmg On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Zoran Zorkic <zo...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Jan 28, 8:07 pm, dmg <d...@uvic.ca> wrote: > >> But I want to fix the problems. So if we can find a good test case >> that shows the bug, I'll take care of it. > > I made a simple one. Here's the rar: > http://lemur.dreamhosters.com/hugin/ptMenderTest.rar > It contains my low pano and pto + ptstitcher scripts for a simple -90 > pitch transform. > It also has an output, images + log. > > Please test it out. > > BTW in low-res Nona kicks PTmenders ass as it seems. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx > > -- --dmg --- Daniel M. German http://turingmachine.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
