Yuval Levy wrote:
On March 21, 2010 05:44:49 pm Darko Makreshanski wrote:
this mode wouldn't represent the output, but would represent an
overview of the panorama in 3D space
if you want to represent the panorama in 3D space properly, a Photosynth-like
approach is better than the panosphere.
My idea was not related to photosynth in terms of providing a way to
browse through a panorama, but rather present the results of the
optimizer in a more convenient and intuitive way for beginners. Thus,
the final goal with the panosphere would be to visualize and let users
interact with the intermediate step of the panorama, that is the
panosphere. This system would contain both the spherical model without
Tr parameters and the mosaic model with Tr parameters. In the mosaic
model the hypothetical plane would also be rendered. Also some other
features, as I have explained in previous mails, will be included to
increase the user experience.
I'm actually still not sure what is the general opinion about this
feature, since apart from James, no one else has commented on it.
Best,
Darko
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or
reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
