Hi, This is more of a pano question than a hugin question, but I figure those who know the math behind can probably confirm, or tell me to stop complaining and just shoot cause it's all in my head.
I've been shooting pano with a 10mm for a while. 3 rows (4-8-4 pictures each) then a nadir with the tripod out of the way. The position of the camera for the nadir is as close I can estimate, but not perfect. Process in hugin, have 2 lens, one for the nadir shot, and one for everything else (optimize for position view and barrel for both lens). Once the CP cleanded, I typically had a perfect pano. Hardly any problem with the nadir. Now, I just switched to an 8mm fish eye. Really nice since I need less pictures, but the nadir always has some working on required. I get the feeling that the height was compensated by the FOV optimisation on the rectilinear, but the same does not work for a fish eye lens. Does this make sense? To help, I typically remove any CP from the nadir that is not close to the center, and add some when there are not many. This typically helps reduce the number of stitching error, but I still get to do some postprocessing to correct a few. Comments, suggestions, personal stories... don't hesitate! nick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
