It wasn't my recommendation, but I would agree.
Why? Last heard, negative material can capture a wider dynamic
brightness range from a scene than transparency material. Plus, the
developed film has a *lower* dynamic density range than
transparencies. That should make it easier to get higher quality scans.
eo
On Sep 23, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Yuval Levy wrote:
On September 23, 2010 06:26:32 am Carl von Einem wrote:
Shoot color negative film and scan the frames with 16 bit.
any reason why you recommend color negative as opposed to slides?
try VueScan (hamrick.com)
highly recommended. It has given new life to my old Nikon CoolScan
LS30
(Nikon stopped publishing drivers after Windows 2000).
Yuv
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
