Projection is still best with slides, true. Have to visit Rollei at the
Photokina on Saturday :-)
Cheers,
Carl
Yuval Levy schrieb am 24.09.10 13:35:
Thanks, Carl.
On September 24, 2010 01:46:08 am Carl von Einem wrote:
Eric is right, it's about the dynamic range of negatives vs. positive
You taught me sonething. I always thought they had the same
characteristics...
To put it the other way round: is there a reason why you would prefer
slide film over negs if we put away all digital cameras for a moment?
... and that the difference was made by the output "medium" (paper vs. light).
My reason to prefer slides over negatives for my silver-based photography back
in the time was the size and vibrance of a projection compared with the small
size, environmental impact, and relatively less vibrant sight of a printed
negative. Nothing to do with stitching. A lot to do with available wall
space. And with money too - I'd be bankrupt had I printed my selected slide
show on Ilfochrome.
I first came to slides when I got introduced to underwater photography. Then
I used one roll of slides on land and was immediately sold.
Yuv
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
