On November 7, 2010 06:29:24 am bruno.postle wrote: > On Nov 7, 5:32 am, Alf <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is more a complaint about the tools, e.g. autopano-sift, etc. > > rather than Hugin itself, which is great. The main CPU-intensive > > tools only seem to be single-threaded. > > autopano-sift-c is single threaded, but nona should use all available > cores, enblend-enfuse can be built multi-threaded but isn't by > default. > > The cpfind replacement for autopano-sift-c in the Hugin trunk should > be multi-threaded.
multi-threading and trying to optimize the software for the given hardware is all good and well, but there is still a residue of "waiting in front of the computer" time that does not go away. Given the use-case panostart [0] is IMHO likely to be more of a time saver than faster software. [0] http://search.cpan.org/~bpostle/Panotools-Script-0.25/bin/panostart
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
