> multi-threading and trying to optimize the software for the given hardware is > all good and well, but there is still a residue of "waiting in front of the > computer" time that does not go away. Given the use-case panostart [0] is > IMHO likely to be more of a time saver than faster software.
For this use case the batch processor is intended. You can add different projects for stitching but also for generating control points (and optimising). And then the computer can work and you don't need to sit before it. PTBatcherGUI can also automatic generate projects in a similiar way like panostart. Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
