Hi, Quick answer as I have familiy visits today (It's christmas) and leaving in 30 minutes.
2010/12/26 Yuval Levy <[email protected]> > Hoi Harry, > > Thank you for the whole information about sieve size width height. We need > more such practical info and we should expect this to be a "frequently > asked > question" (i.e. add it to the Hugin FAQ [0] ). > > We need to determine whether the optimal sieve parameters depend on only on > the lens type (fisheye vs. rectilinear lens); or if they also depend on > focal > distance; on image size; and maybe on other factors as well. > > Thank you for adding it to the FAQ. However, there is also the cpfind page on wiki.panotools.org [0] that Thomas wrote. I remembered it from earlier discussions when Pablo mentioned it, but I also checked the cpfind page. > > > Optimization of the panos was weak to rubbish, be it that I don't have > > experience with fisheye panos, so maybe I did something not completely > > right. > > > possible. did you check visually if the detected CP correspond? this is > what > we need now. > > > Yes, I did check. In the final run that generated 64 CP pairs I deleted 10 pairs as they didn't fit at all. Some others were badly fitted as well. I will do some further tests. Harry [0]: <http://wiki.panotools.org/Cpfind> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
