On 25 Dez., 19:26, Yuval Levy <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1. REFERENCE: `time panomatic -o panomatic.default.pto *.jpg` > > real 1m17.629s > user 2m20.150s > sys 0m2.980s > > these results are puzzling. they require more confirmation to see if this is > an exceptional case, or if the issue affects more cases and we can only find > this out if the code is out in real world use. > > In terms of speed, cpfind (default) is almost 20% faster than panomatic > (default), but what is speed if the quality is not there? since you refer to panomatic as your reference, did you take into account that panomatic also scales down the images? To make a valid speed comaprison, you have to also call panomatic with the --fullscale flag. > What surprises me is that cpfind's results are worse at full scale than > resized. that is indeed very worrying! I made a trial, though, and the --fullscale version did take much longer, but also produced more CPs. > Please continue discussion and testing there. ...oops, saw that too late Kay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
