Hey Yuv, On Jan 2, 9:47 pm, Yuval Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > B. SPECIFYING THE NEW NEEDS > > 1. there is a case/request to activate/deactivate CPs > 2. there is a case to weight CPs > 3. there is a case to discern the source of CPs (human or computer generated) > I would like to add
4. case to mark sets of CPs to be used for morph-to-fit. This potentially very useful function deserves to be revived. Dersch's original implementation is too limited and hard to use, but with a better engine and a good UI, morph-to-fit could be a real parallax-killer. Best, Tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
