On Mar 29, 12:12 pm, Agos <[email protected]> wrote: > the results are indeed very impressive. I'll leave to those who know math to > say if this could really be useful for hugin :)
Yeah, I don't understand the math either! But it looks like they are solving the laplace portion in a different way that's faster. I know from speed tests I've done before if that could be used to speed up enblend then stitching large panos would be much faster. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
