On 15 May 2011 15:25, spsilk <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lukas, > > Thanks for the reply. Hope you're in better health now. Did you have > any opportunity to try my image set? Thanks. > > - Simon >
Thanks for pointing this out, I almost forgot about this issue. It's only a few days since I returned home from a hospital. I did only a short test and it seems to work relatively fine. There is a difference between the generated weights when the number of iterations is increased, but the difference is negligible. Actually you can test it on your own too. It is possible to save the generated wights using the deghosting_mask utility. To do that, run deghosting_mask -i ITER -v -w w *.jpg where ITER is the desired number of iterations. Brighter color means more influence on the resulting image (that means.that completely black parts of an image are left out from the result). But I noticed a different problem. There is an ugly artifact in the sky. I don't know where it comes from. It might be some saturation problem. Lukas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
