Hi Kay, this sure sounds like a bug.
On 13 Wrz, 21:34, kfj <[email protected]> wrote: > In the parts where the new algorithm did place seams (so, between the > images it used rather than ignored, it's a 6+1+2), the seam placement > was a great deal better than that of the old algorithm. This makes me > want to have the new one working very much, never mind it's slow! If > needed, I can try and reduce the problem to a simple test case, > compress the images and file a bug report. > That would be much appreciated! The algorithm is new, so we have to iron out the bugs that didn't appear in early tests. As for the "slow" part, please make sure that you are building without debug symbols. From my experience it had a significant impact on performance. The algorithm _is_ slower, but it shouldn't be too bad even for big pictures. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
