Yes very helpful (especially now that I have an idea how to use it.) Agree with you and Bruno, thinner is better. Don't know if this would be convenient in the context of the code, but it would be perfect if the lines stayed the same size as you zoom the planosphere. BTW, what a great idea the planosphere view is. So far I haven't done any spherical panoramas, but I'm sure this makes checking things before rendering much easier. I love it even for my cylindrical panos. Since most of my panos are hand held (and pretty sloppy) the vertical lines are helpful for seeing if things are plumb all over. And the ability to zoom it is super handy.
On Oct 3, 2:49 pm, Harry van der Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the grid is helpfull, but personally I think the vertical grid lines > are too thick. They are not simply lines but complete bars, at least on OS > X. See attached preview of a to be enfused stacked small part of the > preview. > > So here is for the poll: I like the grid but I prefer the vertical lines not > this fat but like the horizontal ones. > > I'd like to here others opinion on the grid as well (Not on the photo off > course). > > Harry > > fatgridonpreviewOSX.jpg > 43KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
