Yuv wrote:
Hi all,
On Dec 26, 6:58 am, Stefan Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/24/2011 09:13 PM, Yuv wrote:
As an aside: the binaries on the Hugin PPA still mention autopano-sift
and autopano-sift-c as suggested packages. This is obsolete and
should be removed IMHO.
I don't agree here: as long as the Debian packages use this suggestion,
we should keep it in, too.
I agree with you that 'buntu packages should try to follow upstream
Debian, however I am puzzled how Debian can recommend packages that it
does not distribute:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=autopano&searchon=names§ion=all
I know that autopano-sift-c is patent encumbered
This is not the reason for dropping the suggestion. As you correctly
remarked, this is not a dependency. A suggested package is a package
that the maintainer of the installed package recommends. Can you
recommend autopano*?
On Dec 26, 9:53 am, Andreas Metzler <[email protected]>
wrote:
Thanks for the friendly hint. I have dropped the suggestion in Debian
packaging git repository, I will change it in the next upload to
unstable.
I would suggest recommending are LuminanceHDR and Gimp as they are
useful in processing Hugin's output.
Or pfstoolsgui for HDR processing.
--
Gnome Nomad
[email protected]
wandering the landscape of god
http://www.cafepress.com/otherend/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
