Nice work David Haberthür @ George ...Excellent work Sir.
Printing equirects or printing planets is fine. But how can we take it to an fineart level printouts? Here are few questions 1. Do all equirects are print worthy? Equirects present a very distorted view. As per my experience, An equirect full of arches looks good in printout as there is minimal distortion. http://www.worldwidepanorama.org/worldwidepanorama/wwp1210/html/EmaduddinBtt-6649.html 2. We should extract frames from equirect for better printing? If Yes, than are there any HUGIN templates available to extract frames from equirects? 3. Gigantic Fineart printouts sells at a very nice price and our panoramas are already high res images. What should be ideal print size to attract perple? Any more suggestion? On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 6:37 AM, George R <[email protected]> wrote: > Emaad, > Here is a VR I made of a room at an exhibition of prints of my > panoramas in 2008: > http://worldwidepanorama.org/wwp_rss/go/n5257 > The prints were made by a company in London called "The Print Space" > http://www.theprintspace.co.uk/ the largest of those was 0.75mx > 1.5m. Any printer with a large-scale ink jet should be able to do > them for you at a price! When you print at that sort of size you > finally see every flaw and every grain of dust on your camera's > sensor. So you really need to check every pixel before the image goes > to the printer. > > I found that, because of the distortion, people had difficulty > "reading" the bottom and top 5% or so of an equirectangular image. So > rather than printing in the 2:1 ratio of a full equirectangular I > found that the 12:5 aspect ratio worked better ... with a little strip > cropped top and bottom - in the case of clear skies I probably took a > little more off the bottom than the top. > > In the exhibition in that VR I also had square images generated with > a polar-transformation - more recently I have used Hugin's > Stereographic projection to achieve a similar effect. I found that > having a mixture of stereographic and rectangular panoramas helps the > visitor get the idea that they are looking at (almost) full 360° > panoramas. > > It is easy to get fixated on showing the full 360° ... but not every > print needs to use the whole image. I have found that cropping images > to as little as 200° can produce a panoramic image that still has > plenty of impact and often more impact than would be possible with a > complete equirectangular image. [ for example > > http://www.redbubble.com/people/veryireland/collections/20167-rectangular-panoramas > ] > > George > > On Jan 19, 9:31 am, Emad ud din Bhatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anybody has tried to make printouts for art galleries from Hugin? > > > > Please share ideas about printing equirects. > > > > -- > > > > *Emaad*www.flickr.com/emaad > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx > -- *Emaad* www.flickr.com/emaad -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
