On 26 Feb., 14:35, Erik Krause <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 26.02.2012 09:36, schrieb kfj:
> > So now I wonder, is the documentation wrong, or the program, or both? > > I guess it's you - I made the same mistake some time ago :-) > > The doc says "for 360 degree vertical panoramas", which is exactly what > it's meant for. It does not wrap around zenith and nadir, but around the > +/-180 border just like for horizontally oriented panoramas only that > this border isn't assumed left and right but top and bottom. This is the > case f.e. for a cylindrical panorama shot with a horizontal main > rotation axis. I see! Seems like I didn't read the small print closely enough! And of course enblend isn't restricted to panoramas but can offer any option it thinks useful, like the --wrap=vertical+horizontal, which I suppose can't be used for a panorama? > Blending across zenith and nadir isn't that easy. PTStitcherNG does it > by stitching and blending a separate zenith and nadir cap and then > blending those into the rest of the panorama. See > http://webuser.hs-furtwangen.de/~dersch/PTStitcherNG/Changes.txt > for details. doing it by flipping and shifting every othe strip probably works well enough, never mind the distortion around the poles. Treating the pole caps separately seems like the 'proper' way of doing it, though. I just tried and got PTStitcherNG to run under wine on my Linux system. Do you know if there's a genuine Linux version floating about somewhere? Kay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
