On Sunday, 8 July 2012 at 16:08:28 +1000, Terry Duell wrote: > Hello Greg, > > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:11:36 +1000, Greg 'groggy' Lehey > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That turned out not to be the issue. Brief version: I've installed >> version Pre-Release 2011.5.0.cf3324753b7f > > OK, without checking, that looks like the latest default branch code.
Yes, I checked it out this morning. >> and I have cpfind working now, at least some of the time. The >> problem was that the parameters to cpfind are different from those >> for panomatic, and not only did I not know that, I couldn't find >> anywhere to set them. I seem to remember that you could set this >> kind of thing in earlier versions of Hugin, but I can't find >> anything in the current version. > > Do you mean you can't set cpfind parameters in 2011.5.0.cf3324753b7f? > I am running a build of the latest gui_overhaul branch, and editing CP > detector parameters is OK here. My first guess is that this part of the > code would probably be unchanged. > In the main window, use file > preferences > control point detectors, > select your detector and then select 'edit' to play with the > parameters. Ah, thanks. Yes, that works. >> I'm still investigating things, and there's a lot more to say. It >> seems that both panomatic and cpfind will create control points on a >> single image, and not even correctly. One example is at >> http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-jul2012.php#hugin-bug , but I've seen >> it with cpfind as well. > > A couple of quick tests here with only one image and cpfind doesn't find > any control points. It's not that simple. 32 bit cpfind doesn't find them here either, and sometimes the 64 bit version doesn't either. The images for the panorama in the diary entry (http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-jul2012.php#hugin-bug) are at http://www.lemis.com/grog/Photos/20120706/tiny/house-looking-s-0.jpeg to http://www.lemis.com/grog/Photos/20120706/tiny/house-looking-s-3.jpeg if anybody's interested in trying them. But I doubt it is repeatable elsewhere. One thing that occurs to me is that maybe the bug is compiler version sensitive. I used gcc 4.2 to build this Hugin. I also have gcc 4.6.4 and gcc 4.7.2. Does anybody think that might help? Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger [email protected] for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua
pgpUXcD4cRVWt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
