On Monday, 9 July 2012 at 15:49:29 +1000, Terry Duell wrote: > Hello Greg, > > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 16:46:07 +1000, Greg 'groggy' Lehey > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It's not that simple. 32 bit cpfind doesn't find them here either, >> and sometimes the 64 bit version doesn't either. The images for >> the panorama in the diary entry >> (http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-jul2012.php#hugin-bug) are at >> http://www.lemis.com/grog/Photos/20120706/tiny/house-looking-s-0.jpeg >> to >> http://www.lemis.com/grog/Photos/20120706/tiny/house-looking-s-3.jpeg >> if anybody's interested in trying them. But I doubt it is >> repeatable elsewhere. > > Here, (current gui_default branch, 64 bit, build with gcc-4.7.0-5) > cpfind only manages to find CPs on pics xxx-1 and xxx-2. Maybe that > is a function of the image resolution. Were you working with the > images referred to above, or with higher res versions?
Ah, sorry. There are three different resolutions of image there; I accidentally gave the smallest (300x225). FWIW, I didn't get any control points at all with the images I mentioned, but there are full-sized versions at http://www.lemis.com/grog/Photos/20120706/big/house-looking-s-0.jpeg to http://www.lemis.com/grog/Photos/20120706/big/house-looking-s-3.jpeg , and that should work fine. But I'd be surprised if you got the same results. What system and word size are you using? I've written up yesterday's experiments in my diary at http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-jul2012.php#hugin , including images of how far off the control points are. I've done a lot more experimentation today, including running the i386 versions of cpfind and panomatic under the amd64 version of Hugin. In the case of the images we're talking about here, panomatic-i386 does much better and doesn't create any control points on the same image. But with another panorama, the problem persists, suggesting that it's not (only) in the control point detectors. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger [email protected] for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua
pgpeiAW0u2f9K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
