On 11 September 2012 10:03, Rogier Wolff <rew-googlegro...@bitwizard.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:09:50AM -0400, Bruno Postle wrote: >> Sharpening doesn't survive remapping very well, so you should apply it to
> If my math intuition is good, the -0.5 2 -0.5 convolution is the > inverse of 0,1,1,0. Such a convolution might be possible to build into > the remapping operation to keep the images as sharp as the original. Artificially 'sharpened' images are a special case, you don't find this kind of data in 'normal' photos, these don't really suffer any loss of focus in the standard remapping used by Hugin. -- Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
