Michael -
Am Dienstag, 27. November 2012 07:13:21 UTC+1 schrieb Michael Witten:
> > Is there a way to keep `enblend' from choosing alternate seams? Are
> > there better ways to achieve this faux-bracketing?
>
> I have not yet explored its
possibilities, but even Enblend-4.0 offers an
`optimizer-weights' option that balances the
contribution of the distance (from the initial
seam line) contribution and the image-data
mismatch (along the current seam line) to the
optimal seam line. You'd say
--optimizer-weights=1:0
in your case.
In Enblend-4.1 you'll find a
`primary-seam-generator', where the default is
`graph-cut' and AFAIK the image contents is
taken into account. OTOH,
`nearest-feature-transform' only uses the
images' shapes not their contents. So for you,
--primary-seam-generator=nearest-feature-transform
will be preferable.
Furthermore, version 4.1 will allow fine-tuning
how the image difference in the overlapping
areas is computed: option `image-difference'.
(IMHO, the default overweights the chrominance,
but that's a matter of taste.)
In any case please consult the manual of
Enblend.
BTW, Enblend/Enfuse 4.1 have not been released
yet, but soon will be!
HTH,
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
