Why not faux-bracket the source images first, then stack and enfuse them before stitching? This is similar to making bracketed images from RAW files (eliminates alignment/movement difficulties common to conventional bracketing.) I have to admit, most of my panos are from jpegs shot with cheap point and shoots that don't do RAW (and using TIFF is too onerous.) John
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:13:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Witten wrote: > > I've achieved some pleasing results by using `Hugin' to stitch a > panorama several times with various Exposure Values, and then passing > this faux-bracketed stack through `enfuse' to yield the final, > exposure-fused result; this usually pulls out more details, especially > in places like a sky that might otherwise be blown out and clipped. > > Unfortunately for this technique, the choice of seams made by > `enblend' occasionally depends on the Exposure Value setting; > consequently, various features in the images of the faux-bracketed > stack don't align, and thus the final exposure-fused panorama exhibits > ghosting and the like. > > Is there a way to keep `enblend' from choosing alternate seams? Are > there better ways to achieve this faux-bracketing? > > Thanks, > Michael Witten > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
