Thanks, That's not bad. Did you have some control points about 100 pixels out of alignment? I have historically found that PTGui is cumbersome where multiple lens are used in one panorama, however it seems I gave up to early this time. 2 of the input images are visibly distorted from what a geometrically correct cylindrical pano should look like.
On Friday, 8 March 2013 07:43:56 UTC+10, panostar wrote: > > On Mar 7, 11:12 am, Karmadillo <directrix.digi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > PTgui is even less suitable because of it's design to use one lens for > all > > photos. > > PTGui can use different lens parameters for each image. I stitched it > and got some sort of result. Not perfect, but then the images are > probably not geometrically perfect cylindrical partial panoramas: > > http://www.johnhpanos.com/katore_pano.jpg > > John > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
