Hello Hans,
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:06:38 +1000, [email protected] <[email protected]>
wrote:
Thank you so much, Terry! And thank you for the tips! In fact I do not
see
the "sharpness" problem in your stitch!
Just uploaded _DSC7681-0.JPG here (though I included it as well in the
archive):
Image 7681 definitely not in the archive that arrived here!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1ha2vhsdjwjltmp/_DSC7681-_DSC7689___x.jpg?dl=0
The above link is to one of your stitches, not the 7681 image. It probably
is worth having another go at providing that image just to be sure that
the result is the same here when using it.
I'm using Hugin & nona 2014.0.0.51ff237f209e, enblend-mp 4.1.2, all on
Ubuntu 14.04 64bit.
Did you use graphcut as the primary seam generator? Did you use gpu
remapping for nona?
I use the default primary seam generator (nearest-feature-transform), and
do not use gpu remapping.
I used Enblend 4.1.3, although given that Multiblend didn't make any
difference for you, I suspect the blending isn't the culprit.
If I still get the same (sharp) result using all your images, we will need
to have another think about what is going on...maybe others have seen this
previously.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.xlf9jefxrs0ygh%40localhost.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
