Hello Kyle,
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 06:07:57 +1100, Kyle Johnson <[email protected]>
wrote:
[snip]
Here is the basic script we use to build these panoramas.
pto_gen --projection=2 --output=project.pto *.tif
pto_var --set "v=112.5" --output=project.pto project.pto
pto_var --opt
"v,d,e,g,t,EeV,Er,Eb,Vb,Vc,Vd,Vx,Vy,Ra,Rb,Rc,Rd,Re,y,p,r,TrX,TrY,TrZ"
--output=project.pto project.pto
cpfind -o project.pto project.pto
cpclean -o project.pto project.pto
linefind --output=project.pto project.pto
autooptimiser -a -l -m -s -o project.pto project.pto
pano_modify -s -c -o project.pto project.pto
nona -o working_ project.pto
enblend --output="completed.tif" working_*
convert completed.tif -quality 100 #{name}.jpg
I have tried several variations on cpfind options, such as --fullscale
and sieve1/sieve2 settings, as well as changes to optimizer settings, but
none significantly impact this curvature issue, and many of those
introduce other problems.
In general, what should I do to improve the output? Am I doing something
wrong?
I'm guessing (as usual) but I would try adding "--fov=AUTO --projection=2"
to pano_modify and see if that makes any difference...assuming you want
equirectangular projection, or use 1 for cylindrical projection, which may
give less distortion.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.xq4yj8qkrs0ygh%40localhost.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
