Hello David,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:53:56 +1000, Monkey <[email protected]> wrote:
I think it's just down to the blender's differing methods of determining
seams. I don't know how verdandi works, but Enblend and multiblend use
different methods.
Yes, that's understood, but the curious behaviour, which I should have
explained a bit more clearly, is that enblend has, in the past, produced a
result without the blurring, and using the images in the same order, as
shown in the tutorial.
[snip]
Finally, if you're after timing comparisons, you're going to need a
*much* bigger panorama.
I did say it was a simple test, and only aimed at providing an indication
of the differences in speed.
I agree, that most of the time for the project discussed, would be down to
other processing, which would be the same for each case, and an accurate
measure of blending time would require a more clever test.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.xxik4nagrs0ygh%40localhost.localdomain.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
