On Wednesday, 22 April 2015 22:53:11 UTC+1, Roger Broadie wrote: > > Monkey <[email protected] <javascript:>> commented on Wed, 22 Apr 2015 > at > 04:53:56 -0700 (PDT): > > "The blurred patch [in Terry Duell's screenshot of Tue, 21 Apr 2015 at > 17:37:32 +1000] is not down to the blending as such, but is already > present in scan-1.jpg." > > I don't see that. True, there is blurring by the right-hand edge of the > image, presumably due to a lifting of the original at the edge of the > scanning area, and similar blurring, no doubt for a corresponding > reason, by the left-hand edge of tscan-2.jpg. > > *But in neither is there significant blurring in the region of the most > noticeable blurring in Terry's enblend example*, which is around the > central vein of the nearly > vertical leaf on the right of the stitched image, > *which is rotated with respect to the original scans in order to orient it > correctly.* >
I don't see that anything's been rotated. Here's Terry's blend with tscan-1.jpg next to it, with the matching blurred areas highlighted: http://s9.postimg.org/mdpmz69an/screenshot_2.jpg -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/21b56183-6522-41ed-b1e9-92b211e96703%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
