Hi,
I am an amateur photographer and lately got a Gear VR device so I wanted to 
try some VR Stuff.
Testing free panorama tools, I found that Hugin was the only free tool 
providing decent results. Also, my 'Fisheye' lens uses Stereographic 
projection, so most other tools are not even able to stitch my input 
material correctly.

Now, the last days, weeks, ... even months(?) ... I am trying to find a 
good way to capture stereoscopic panoramas with my one camera. After alot 
of trial and error, I found that the best method for me is to place the 
camera left and right the NPP and take 12 images for the 360° circle. Now 
with hugin, I align them and export the frames but don't stitch them yet. 
For that I use the multiblend <http://horman.net/multiblend/> tool and 
first extract its seams. Then I edit the seams that left and right eye 
matches and blend with these optimized seams. My problem with this method 
is, that by taking 12 left-eye images and afterwards 12 right-eye images, 
the time between the left and right eye is to long: Clouds pass by and even 
the sun travels. Flipping between left and right is inpractical and causes 
many mistakes if I try to do it fast.

What I would like to do is to have the camera in front (not left or right) 
of the NPP, take 12 photos and use only right image-halfes for the left eye 
and vice versa. This works more or less, but here the big issue is, that 
the paralaxe gets too strong and the stiching result is a mess with alot of 
visible seams. At this place I wish it was possible, that hugin looks for 
areas with bad control-points. If the photos were taken from a tripod (with 
paralaxe), the error should equal the depth of the control points. At least 
if there are areas with a bigger error (and similar error vectors) and 
others with less error, the software could treat this as depth. Now with 
depth information of the control-points, this becomes something similar to 
visual sfm. The controlpoints are like a sparse point cloud and I'd suggest 
simply interpolating the areas between the controlpoints to get a perfect 
stitching result.

If hugin could actually support stitching photos that are taken off the 
NPP. It could also assist creating stereoscopic panoramas.

What do you think about this? Is Hugin still actively developed or is it 
rather a complete product which is just supported?

Kind Regards,
Simon

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/67025095-5331-417b-b9f4-65dfbdce1936%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to