2016-06-20 1:21 GMT+02:00 Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[email protected]>: > On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 11:14:08 -0700, Gloom Demon wrote: > > What is the difference between making panoramas in Hugin and doing them > in > > Photoshop (GIMP)? > > Those are two different products, of course. I don't know the > details, but I suspect there would be a long list of differences. > > > Does Photoshop make them better? > > Last time I heard, no, much worse. but that was a long time ago, and > I'm sure things have improved. But how much? > > > If not - why the hassle? > > If not, because you then have no choice. If so, Photoshop still costs > an arm and a leg. If you have Photoshop, why not do a comparison and > report back? >
Also, I wonder if the answer wouldn't depend on how the panorama was taken. Photoshop might be better at hiding glitches in a panorama taken without a pano head, for example. So if someone ever does tests, testing different scenarios would make the test more meaningful. -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CANe_y9T-qHZk%2Bhp0NW6Fw69dFFwmpzZBN%3Dp0uNz3cNJpYa0xSQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
