Yeah this really looks like modern art :D The size was calculated by hugin.
I have player around with the options: For me the best setting is: --pre-assemble --primary-seam-generator=nearest-feature-transform No black holes & full size panorama Am Samstag, 4. November 2017 06:12:01 UTC+1 schrieb GnomeNomad: > > Wow, that's a major abstract/psychedlic blowup in middle of the 2nd > (larger) image. > > I have no idea where it might come from. Anyone else? > > Just out of curiousity ... was that 36336 pixel width set by Hugin > (using the Stitcher tab's "Calculate Optimal Width" button), or a width > you specified? > > On 11/02/2017 09:39 PM, jojaeger...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote: > > This night hugin success the build process with no error. > > > > One with a width of 20000 > > One with a width of 36336 > > > > But here you can see yourself, something went wrong: > > www.dropbox.com/s/bjswqcl2s4nurg2/20k_36k.png?dl=0 > > > > > > Am Freitag, 3. November 2017 01:09:25 UTC+1 schrieb GnomeNomad: > > > > > > > > On November 2, 2017 1:20:04 PM HST, Sean Greenslade wrote: > > >On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:42:36PM -0700, jojaeger...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > >> Thanks for your reply. > > >> Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated. > > >> > > >> Exsample from Enblend: > > >> http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm > > <http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm> > > >> > > >> Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bigger > > >solution. > > >> > > >> Or is this a different version of enblend? > > > > > >That article is apparently from 2004 and references version 2.0. I > > >would > > >imagine there have been significant changes since then. Also, it > uses > > >only 2 source images that contain solid rectangles of color. The > seam > > >finder isn't gonna do much with those. > > > > Many years ago, I produced a simple strip pano that covered about 10 > > miles of coastline with 6MP images. It resulted in a 768MB 16-bit > > TIFF. I stitched it on a Linux system with 2GB RAM and lots of swap > > space. It completed successfully but IIRC took 16 hours. > > > > Nothing like the pano you're talking about here, but maybe an > > indication that it could be successful with enough swap space and > time? > > > -- > David W. Jones > gnome...@gmail.com <javascript:> > wandering the landscape of god > http://dancingtreefrog.com > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/c9fbfd45-301e-45ab-aca6-8ee41532be37%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
