On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 1:34:37 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
> > The photos should align seamlessly, if they look to have different > distortions then something is wrong. > > I apparently stated things unclearly. I was discussing the target overlap of the three original images (mostly overlapped) not the panorama results. The point of noting that very high overlap is that the total viewing angle of the panorama isn't much greater than that of the middle photo alone. So it is surprising that the whole panorama must be so much more distorted than the original middle photo. I haven't yet gotten near seamless alignment. Sections that are blended are terrible. But that is an entirely separate issue from the distortion of the projection. In the past (before you explained things about the optimize process to me) I got past poor alignment with lots of masking to control where the poor blending occurs. Masking might also answer the original exposure question of this thread. I'm currently trying masking as a solution for comparison to other solutions: Better control points and optimize to improve alignment combined with using an external tool to shift the exposure based on vertical coordinate. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/3052370b-62a0-43ba-a692-be53a25529bbn%40googlegroups.com.
