batch stitching with lux is quite simple. All lux needs to stitch a PTO is a command line like this:
lux --stitch=yes my.pto
and to stitch several, just pass them all on the command line:
lux --stitch=yes *.pto
The resulting files are named automatically and no metadata are transferred, if you want that, you'll have to employ exiftool.

the command line is like this, with use of gpu for nona:

set nona="%ProgramFiles%\Hugin\bin\nona.exe"
set enblend="%ProgramFiles%\Hugin\bin\enblend.exe"

%nona% -g -o out -m TIFF_m template.pto %Rfolder%/%date%/IMG_%imagenr%.JPG %Lfolder%/%date%/IMG_%imagenr%.JPG
    echo Done Nona
%enblend% -o %outputname%-IMG_%imagenr%.JPG --compression %jq% out0000.tif out0001.tif
    echo Done Enblend, next file?

and lux replaces both nona and enblend?
something like?

set lux="%ProgramFiles%\Hugin\bin\lux.exe"

%lux% -g --stitch=yes %Rfolder%/%date%/IMG_%imagenr%.JPG %Lfolder%/%date%/IMG_%imagenr%.JPG template.pto -o %outputname%-IMG_%imagenr%.JPG


I know it's in hugin, but never understood how to employ exiftool via cmd and f.i. copy the left image exif data to the enblend output file.


With lux, you don't have to do this, because lux multithreads internally, so when it does a stitch, it uses all available CPU cores anyway. You can't gain speed from running several instances.

ah, you really think? as far as i can tell it already uses multicore in the current setup, but since loading and writing takes time and even when processing only one or 2 cores go above 60%, there was in my opinion time enough to try to run more scripts.

Should be the same with lux batch stitching, but you should rather set up a script which does the batch stitch in one folder, then moves to the next and does it there, etc - running them in parallel won't speed it up and use much more memory. Try it out and tell me how it worked for you. Of course the results lux produces are not identical to what nona+enblend produce and you may not be happy with the result. And lux needs lots of memory - if the panoramas are large, it may not be a good idea to stitch them with lux.

i don't have any memory issues (yet), and i feel in a daring mood :)
I will try single and multi instances out and let you know, this might take some time though....

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/0ef2f54c-e918-4fdd-9c17-fde14a18617c%40gmail.com.
  • [hugin-ptx] lu... 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software
    • Re: [hugi... David W. Jones
      • Re: [... 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software
      • Re: [... Maarten Verberne
        • R... 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software
          • ... Maarten Verberne
            • ... 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software
              • ... Maarten Verberne
                • ... 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software
                • ... Maarten Verberne
                • ... 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software
                • ... Maarten Verberne
                • ... 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software
                • ... Maarten Verberne
    • Fwd: [hug... David W. Jones
      • Re: [... 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software

Reply via email to