Everyday; I'm forced to think about , how blind can some of them be, to alter our environment that we rely on for our very existance. I have a completely different view, the auditory effect has changed my view of the world. It's also change my emotional response to situations, my feelings just are not the same as they had been and I can't even tell whether it's a good thing or a bad thing. I guess just like scientific research no feelings. How many clicks per minute would you say that you hear? The amount of pulses I hear change, in length duration and sound intensity, the sound intensity has been aggravating my nervous system on my brain and down into my spine. I mean, how rude is this? Patty
On Mar 7, 7:09 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > I would assume the British govt is getting out of this one the same > way other > countries like the US are getting out of it They dance around the > truth > Same here My ear doctor did testing back in 2005 He said my hearing > was as good as an 18 year olds That I also was hearing crystal clear > Now I hear clicks > of their possible radiofrequency hearing effects or of their Microwave > auditory effects > > Either way, my ears perceive clicks 24/7 I would assume part of > that > affect has to do with the fact they are globally lowering the > trosphere layer > which any fool can visulize by the fact that our clouds are forming > well under > one mile and instead cloud formations globally can be seen at below > 2,000 feet > > They also are making sure to induce the public to perceive this as > normal > concerning the way too numerous reality shows they are broadcasting > TV wise they only broadcast old shows that they have taken the time > to re digitilize of methods they use to influence the public's > perceptions > > We are being subjected to being forced to live n breath inside of a > pressurized > field they are continuing to lower upon us of the lower boundarys of > the trosphere layer Somehow the higher trosphere layer got > compressed alot closer to the lower trosphere layer > Got to wonder what is going on above as they continued to compress > the pressurized fields of our atmosphere layers upon us > > Amplitude and modulation, seems to me, that would be something that > would become increased around us concerning frequencies of ELF or VHF > in a compressized field > > Yes it is more than an auditory effect instead it is becoming a > whole body effect > > On Mar 7, 4:00 am, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Once again I'm re-reading a paper; Human Auditory Perception of > > Pulsed Radiofrequency Energy by J.A. Elder and C.K. Chou. > > I don't know where I found it on the internet but I did. I'm not fans > > of Elder and Chou but they have summarized that, for an individual to > > hear the microwaves they have to meet the physical standard of hearing > > high frequency and have good bone-conduction hearing. I remember when > > I had my hearing test they did test my bone conduction, my hearing was > > crystal clear. At no time during the testing of my bone conduction > > did I have any distortion. Thier is something else that I'm noticing > > though, most of the papers I'm finding are of U.S. origin, just > > quessing; is it possible that they are not counted as crediable > > because of the origin. > > So far as yet, what I have experienced and especially now with our new > > carrier on the Ku band, I know the waves do have an neurological > > effect it is more than an auditory perception. > > Yep I"ve seen the different patents proposed. I also read about > > marine biologist being concerned with whales and dolphines beaching > > themselves, seems it might have something to do with ELF. > > Hows the British government going to get out of this one? > > > On Mar 5, 3:46 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Patty I hear backwards pure tones incorporated into the music at most > > > stores I agree I also research RF n Microwave Auditory Effects(Frey) > > > You might find > > > interesting US Patent 6470214 Method and device for implementing the > > > radio frequency hearing effect (filed 1996 issued 2002) US has rights > > > to it I hear clicks > > > and this patent presents a reason why a population could perceive > > > hearing clicks > > > of waves going thru our heads that produce intelligible or > > > unintelligible sound like the "ringing in our ears" or "clicks"(buzzs > > > n hiss's?) as the sound gets > > > more pronounced as the brain gets a grasp on the sound patterns being > > > perceived > > > > But it is also important to not leave out of the equation the > > > advancing by leaps and bounds of the wireless technologys so quickly > > > over the last 20 yrs > > > That overabundance of manmade MW n RF radiation in our > > > environments, has long been known to be a cause of concern regarding > > > possible harmful effects to the population and not many countries have > > > been rushing to the front of the line to establish safe exposure > > > limits So instead wireless technologys got to advance rapidly without > > > having to worry much about being held accountable for any hazardous > > > effects of EMF mainly because not many countries are forcing the > > > issue but instead they are carefully, with plausible deniabiity, > > > playing at the game > > > of continued need to debate the most basic issue at hand, of what data > > > should > > > or should not be considered as they were designing their modeling > > > formula's > > > thereby hedging their bets the models they built would give back a > > > large > > > pile of inconclusive data 30 yrs later and they can't get past the > > > debating > > > stage BASICALLY THE BAND PLAY'S ON > > > > Wireless, broadband, satellite transmissions,the new wireless > > > of digital voice (home telephone services), WiFI, Bluetooth, Sirrius, > > > WIMAX, > > > 3G, 4G, we as a population are being subjected to living within the > > > boundary's of its perputual transmissions of multiple forms of > > > unnatural manmade radiation fields > > > We can be walking thru it's fields regardless whether we are actually > > > carring > > > a wireless device or not (ie WIMAX ) I also have grave concerns > > > regarding > > > the UK's MW communication program of TETRA > > > > Neurological effects and syndromes are rising at too steep of an > > > incline among the population like the restless leg syndrome, > > > Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue, ADD, etc Auditory effects are part of > > > the equation but the radiation effects within those transmission > > > signal process's that affects our auditory pathways has to be another > > > piece of that equation concerning MW, RF etc Neurological effects > > > can also come from non thermal (athermal) sources besides thermal > > > > United States Patent 6,470,214 > > > O'Loughlin , et al. October 22, 2002 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Method and device for implementing the radio frequency hearing effect > > > > Abstract > > > A modulation process with a fully suppressed carrier and input > > > preprocessor filtering to produce an encoded output; for amplitude > > > modulation (AM) and audio speech preprocessor filtering, intelligible > > > subjective sound is produced when the encoded signal is demodulated > > > using the RF Hearing Effect. Suitable forms of carrier suppressed > > > modulation include single sideband (SSB) and carrier suppressed > > > amplitude modulation (CSAM), with both sidebands present. > > > > Inventors: O'Loughlin; James P. (Placitas, NM), Loree; Diana L. > > > (Albuquerque, NM) > > > Assignee: The United States of America as represented by the Secretary > > > of the Air ((Washington, DC) > > > STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST > > > The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for > > > the Government for governmental purposes without the payment of any > > > royalty thereon. > > > > The Radio Frequency ("RF") Hearing Effect was first noticed during > > > World War II as a subjective "click" produced by a pulsed radar signal > > > when the transmitted power is above a "threshold" level. Below the > > > threshold level, the click cannot be heard. > > > > The discovery of the Radio Frequency Hearing Effect suggested that a > > > pulsed RF carrier could be encoded with an amplitude modulated ("AM") > > > envelope. In one approach to pulsed carrier modulation, it was assumed > > > that the "click" of the pulsed carrier was similar to a data sample > > > and could be used to synthesize both simple and complex tones such as > > > speech. Although pulsed carrier modulation can induce a subjective > > > sensation for simple tones, it severely distorts the complex waveforms > > > of speech, as has been confirmed experimentally. > > > > The presence of this kind of distortion has prevented the click > > > process for the encoding of intelligible speech. An example is > > > provided by AM sampled data modulation. > > > > Upon demodulation the perceived speech signal has some of the envelope > > > characteristics of an audio signal. Consequently a message can be > > > recognized as speech when a listener is preadvised that speech has > > > been sent. However, if the listener does not know the content of the > > > message, the audio signal is unintelligible. > > > > The attempt to use the click process to encode speech has been based > > > on the assumption that if simple tones can be encoded, speech can be > > > encoded as well, but this is not so. > > > > A simple tone can contain several distortions and still be perceived > > > as a tone whereas the same degree of distortion applied to speech > > > renders it unintelligible. > > > > SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION > > > > In accomplishing the foregoing and related object the invention.. > > > FOREGOING - Said, written, or encountered just before; previous > > > ----- > > > The RF Hearing Effect is explained and analyzed as a thermal to > > > acoustic demodulating process. Energy absorption in a medium, such as > > > the head, causes mechanical expansion and contraction, and thus an > > > acoustic signal. > > > > When the expansion and contraction take place in the head of an > > > animal, the acoustic signal is passed by conduction to the inner ear > > > where it is further processed as if it were an acoustic signal from > > > the outer ear. > > > > The RF to Acoustic Demodulator thus has characteristics which permit > > > the conversion of the RF energy input to an acoustic output. > > > > Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a novel > > > technique for the intelligible encoding of signals. A related object > > > is to provide for the intelligible encoding of speech. > > > > Another object of the invention is to make use of the Radio Frequency > > > ("RF") Hearing Effect in the intelligible demodulation of encoded > > > signals, including speech. > > > > What is claimed is: > > > > 1. > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
