The problem is this- Is Hum noise, or NOT? If it's noise [technically] this means there's no info in it, either way. I think the fact it could be 'other than' noise is an added dimension and worries people. If Hum can be construed as a controlling or info gathering technique then it becomes much more 'dark'.
Now- here's the problem- if it's industrial pollution, AS WELL as a background pickup of secret technology[ies]- & then are merged by the ubiquitous nature of the human ear, as coupled to the central nervous system and brain. Both these sources will be blanked by their respective generators, for fear of disclosure- and while they are merged on receipt, no one can untangle the process[es] in order to present a case. The main drift [under this scenario] of the forum is to provide a open haven where experiences can be discussed and support given, where possible. This is not a lame response, just practical -under these circumstances. Probably, almost everyone who has posted here has a fair point to make- and it's a 'good thing' that the net affords instant and varied feedback on this and many other difficult subjects. On Sep 7, 12:16 am, Steve K <[email protected]> wrote: > Heres the problem. As expereinced by Will - extreme frustration. > Whatever everyones tested or surmised postions are, the entire > complaint process (or lack of of) is so fragmented, no one will ever > get critical mass to get the influeneced politicans to investigate > this crap. Do you realize there are tens of thousands of this problem > around a dozen or so industrialized countries. > > As far as getting tedious, accepted, especially after two years of > intense work. This pipeline thing is not by desire, it is a fallout of > fortunate circumstance for us explainaing a revelation of the years of > no one being able to explain this. This pipline thing is so complex, I > can understand the lack of buy in, that's teh problem with this type > media. No problem. Anyhow, nothing stopping this train until real > research either proves or disproves this. In the meantime, I am sure > there are many other causes, and if all studied like we have done > here, maybe we'll get answers. > > On Aug 16, 9:28 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > hmmm most likely by now their is giving the high number of research > > programs that have gone into creating software and hardware to mimic > > the human ear their has to be some recording devices of microphones > > that likely have a capacity to pick up the lower ELF or some of the > > higher VHF similiar to how our ears would percieve frequencys and > > convert that into vibrations. They didn't get to start designing > > brain models without figuring out how our sensory pathways take what > > it senses and convert it into cell signaling data that makes it way to > > the brain > > > The ears are a unique piece of the brains learning process's as > > they are so uniquely tied in to bone conduction too. The ears hear > > what is happening outside our bodies as well as hearing some of the > > blood that flows thru our bodies. > > > I have been hearing their is a new advanced mircophone on the market > > (perhaps someone can rent it because it costs about $35,000 brand > > new) The hum seems to interfere with our memory pathways too, so I am > > sorry the name of this brand of microphone is alluding me at the > > moment > > > Well I don't think that after all these years it is not as > > classified as we think. I think if proof can be obtained, and > > repeated by others, their is a likeyhood it will be published. This > > is one of those conspiracy theory's that they don't seem to mind as > > much about of the media doing stories on it, > > > I understand your position about hypothesis. Not too many of them > > seem solid to my common sense either. They might be pieces of the > > bigger picture but they are not the main culprit is my opinon. And > > so many want it to be something normal of our everyday lifes rather > > than going outside the box to seek answers. > > > Hang in their. Their is no easy path for us to go forward on. > > Our data is limited and we are stuck with our own common sense trying > > to figure it out as we go along. > > > But I have to agree with Steve, being disrespectful won't get you > > anyplace. Disrepect seems also to be a tool of the trade of trolls. > > > take care > > Dee > > > On Aug 6, 1:56 am, Will Godson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I wrote to Rosmary at the LFNSA. She wrote me back a very nice letter > > > but in it she states she does not hear the hum. So much for that line > > > of enquiry. As for the other pointers 1. There is not a microphone > > > invented that is as good as the human ear. 2. It's obvious who are the > > > genuine hearers and who are trolls. 3. Since we are dealing with > > > something classified top secret no one will be allowed to publish > > > anything which even hints at the truth.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
