I wish I could share all the data, testing and work gone into proving out the gas lines are causing the HUM in the western part of CT and within a hundred miles of here. It comprises of FFT, Spectragraphs, regional acoustic mapping, data from reprots of 2 consultants hired to sway us away from electrical power line and gas compressor sources (it's not electrical!). Mapping around the country vs the US NG grid with 99 % accuracy of hum locations in the proximity of these lines are very conclusive. You might want to check the latest map filed in the yahoo hum forum files section. At any rate, the next steps which are really getting resistance, is to get the info into the local news, gather support and push the politicans who are afraid to let this be expsoed into taking action by an investigation. As john dawes mentions, many obstacles to clear investigation get in teh way. Obviously there are non supporters of this hypotheis, but I haven't seen one iota of good research work to dispute it.
The way this will come to a head is putting this in teh way of expansion, and convincing open minded people what harm this is casuing to us and teh ecossytem. Constant bombradment of ILFN causing seishe waves in pools here certainly is not good.... On Oct 2, 6:20 pm, Steve K <[email protected]> wrote: > The conveyance of the sound waves through the ground are not audible > until some mechanism of reasonance is encountered. At that time the > sound waves (ILFN) become noise to those able to hear the lower > frequencies. More people actually sense a pressure of the ears, or if > intense enough breathing, nausea distress. Tested this out 15 feet > below grade the other day in an office building storage area that is > 0.95 miles from 2 misbehaving gas lines (36 and 30 inch). Human > perception of this stuff varies greatly. > > On Sep 7, 7:22 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The problem is this- Is Hum noise, or NOT? > > If it's noise [technically] this means there's no info in it, either > > way. > > I think the fact it could be 'other than' noise is an added dimension > > and worries people. > > If Hum can be construed as a controlling or info gathering technique > > then it becomes much more 'dark'. > > > Now- here's the problem- if it's industrial pollution, AS WELL as a > > background pickup of secret technology[ies]- & then are merged by the > > ubiquitous nature of the human ear, as coupled to the central nervous > > system and brain. > > Both these sources will be blanked by their respective generators, for > > fear of disclosure- and while they are merged on receipt, no one can > > untangle the process[es] in order to present a case. > > The main drift [under this scenario] of the forum is to provide a open > > haven where experiences can be discussed and support given, where > > possible. > > This is not a lame response, just practical -under these > > circumstances. > > Probably, almost everyone who has posted here has a fair point to > > make- and it's a 'good thing' that the net affords instant and varied > > feedback on this and many other difficult subjects. > > > On Sep 7, 12:16 am, Steve K <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Heres the problem. As expereinced by Will - extreme frustration. > > > Whatever everyones tested or surmised postions are, the entire > > > complaint process (or lack of of) is so fragmented, no one will ever > > > get critical mass to get the influeneced politicans to investigate > > > this crap. Do you realize there are tens of thousands of this problem > > > around a dozen or so industrialized countries. > > > > As far as getting tedious, accepted, especially after two years of > > > intense work. This pipeline thing is not by desire, it is a fallout of > > > fortunate circumstance for us explainaing a revelation of the years of > > > no one being able to explain this. This pipline thing is so complex, I > > > can understand the lack of buy in, that's teh problem with this type > > > media. No problem. Anyhow, nothing stopping this train until real > > > research either proves or disproves this. In the meantime, I am sure > > > there are many other causes, and if all studied like we have done > > > here, maybe we'll get answers. > > > > On Aug 16, 9:28 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > hmmm most likely by now their is giving the high number of research > > > > programs that have gone into creating software and hardware to mimic > > > > the human ear their has to be some recording devices of microphones > > > > that likely have a capacity to pick up the lower ELF or some of the > > > > higher VHF similiar to how our ears would percieve frequencys and > > > > convert that into vibrations. They didn't get to start designing > > > > brain models without figuring out how our sensory pathways take what > > > > it senses and convert it into cell signaling data that makes it way to > > > > the brain > > > > > The ears are a unique piece of the brains learning process's as > > > > they are so uniquely tied in to bone conduction too. The ears hear > > > > what is happening outside our bodies as well as hearing some of the > > > > blood that flows thru our bodies. > > > > > I have been hearing their is a new advanced mircophone on the market > > > > (perhaps someone can rent it because it costs about $35,000 brand > > > > new) The hum seems to interfere with our memory pathways too, so I am > > > > sorry the name of this brand of microphone is alluding me at the > > > > moment > > > > > Well I don't think that after all these years it is not as > > > > classified as we think. I think if proof can be obtained, and > > > > repeated by others, their is a likeyhood it will be published. This > > > > is one of those conspiracy theory's that they don't seem to mind as > > > > much about of the media doing stories on it, > > > > > I understand your position about hypothesis. Not too many of them > > > > seem solid to my common sense either. They might be pieces of the > > > > bigger picture but they are not the main culprit is my opinon. And > > > > so many want it to be something normal of our everyday lifes rather > > > > than going outside the box to seek answers. > > > > > Hang in their. Their is no easy path for us to go forward on. > > > > Our data is limited and we are stuck with our own common sense trying > > > > to figure it out as we go along. > > > > > But I have to agree with Steve, being disrespectful won't get you > > > > anyplace. Disrepect seems also to be a tool of the trade of trolls. > > > > > take care > > > > Dee > > > > > On Aug 6, 1:56 am, Will Godson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I wrote to Rosmary at the LFNSA. She wrote me back a very nice letter > > > > > but in it she states she does not hear the hum. So much for that line > > > > > of enquiry. As for the other pointers 1. There is not a microphone > > > > > invented that is as good as the human ear. 2. It's obvious who are the > > > > > genuine hearers and who are trolls. 3. Since we are dealing with > > > > > something classified top secret no one will be allowed to publish > > > > > anything which even hints at the truth.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
