http://expressbuzz.com/biography/disrespect-for-religion-in-demolition/208528.html

*Disrespect for religion in demolition *



Omar Khalidi <http://expressbuzz.com/searchresult/omar-khalidi>



First Published :
21 Sep 2010 12:17:00 AM IST

Last Updated : 21 Sep 2010 12:24:38 AM IST



*Almost every literate Indian has heard of alleged temple desecration and
destruction at the hands of “Muslim invaders” in the medieval era. Hindutva
propagandists see temple destruction in stark communal terms, perceiving
such vandalism as straightforward evidence of Muslim iconoclasm. Academic
historians, on the other hand, view that temple demolition in India is not
an original Muslim contribution to Indian history.*

*First, long before Muslims arrived, various kings destroyed each other’s
dynastic deities as part of post-conquest delegitimisation of the foe.
Second, during Muslim rule, some temples built with state revenue or on
state land were indeed demolished when some Hindu subjects associated with
the temples rebelled, but such acts cannot be termed Muslim iconoclasm.*

* *

*Besides, Hindu masons and stone carvers built some of the earliest Indian
mosques, which the propagandists mistake for spoilage of ancient temples.
Historical evidence suggests that sometimes Muslims commissioned
architectural elements to be made. As Indian masons were unfamiliar with
Islamic art, they carved, painted or inscribed artistic elements they knew
best regardless of who the patron was.*

* *

*Sometimes, early Muslim rulers adapted building material of abandoned
temples for use in Muslim monuments — all of which suggests a readiness to
tap local building talent and materials rather than disrespect for ancient
Indian building tradition.*

* *

*What is the record of secular India in protecting sacred sites and
unfettered construction of new ones? Leaving aside the cases of the Golden
Temple (1984); demolition of Babri Masjid (1992), and the army-militant
clash in 1995 that demolished Charar-i Sharif in Kashmir, data on mosque
destruction and adverse possession is grim.*

* *

*In the old Punjab state comprising Chandigarh, Haryana, Himachal and
Punjab, 12,000 mosques have been destroyed or turned into temples, houses,
shops, cattle pens, and worse. The destruction and adverse possession of the
mosques are often justified as retaliation for what happened to temples and
gurdwaras in Pakistani Punjab in 1947.*

* *

*Politicians block the return of mosques to their original purpose on the
flimsy ground that Muslim population is absent. But that is no longer the
case, as Muslim migrants from Bihar and UP are found almost everywhere in
Punjab as farm labour.*

* *

*In the former princely states of Alwar and Bharatpur, the fate of numerous
mosques is similar to that of neighbouring Punjab. Hundreds of mosques in
Delhi were destroyed at the time of Independence, “avenging” attacks on
Lahore temples and gurdwaras.*

*Every major bout of post-1947 collective violence exacted a toll of mosques
and associated shrines: 55 mosques were seized in Madhya Pradesh as reported
in 1979; the 1989 Bhagalpur carnage destroyed 57; and the December 1990
Hyderabad violence took a toll of 77 Muslim buildings. The 2002 Gujarat
pogrom saw 236 mosques, dargahs and other sacred sites being demolished.
None have been rebuilt, not even the tomb of Wali Deccani, the 17th century
poet who sang praises of Gujarat.*

* *

*There are two further ways through which Muslims have been denied access to
their places of worship. The Archaeological Survey of India prohibits
worship in as many as 118 mosques under its control. Except in mosques in
territories comprising Nizam’s Hyderabad, prayers have been prohibited in
the ASI-controlled mosques since the early twentieth century. The ASI
theoretically took control of the mosques to protect them when there was no
population using them, but demographic changes since then justify opening
the mosques for worship — their primary purpose.*

* *

*The Union cabinet in 1979 agreed to lift the ban on worship in
ASI-controlled mosques. One can only surmise that it has gone back on its
word, as evidenced by the Muslims’ recurring attempts to offer collective
namaz in the mosques.*

* *

*As if the ASI restrictions were not enough, Hindutva proponents led by
former Union cabinet minister Arun Shourie compiled a list of some 2,000
mosques, dargahs and such structures which are claimed to be former Hindu
temples. Included in this list are some of the most revered shrines.*

* *

*Are the Hindutva pamphleteers’ claims on Islamic shrines harmless fantasy?
Not if you see a pattern of Hindutva actions — beyond words and the process
through which the state acquiesces to the actions.*

* *

*Hindutva outfits converted Jama Masjid in ASI-protected Daulatabad Fort in
1948 into a Bharat Mata Mandir by installing idols in the mihrab of the
medieval mosque. Since then a pattern is discernible. Any “Muslim” building
or site can be claimed by mere assertion that its architecture or building
material resembles “Hindu” features or is built atop a “Hindu” site.*

* *

*Thus in 1970, a Bhagya Laxmi temple began to protrude out of the ASI
protected Charminar. In 1980, Ale Narendra, MP, publicly threatened to
convert Charminar into a Hindu temple, while B G Keskar wanted Mecca Masjid
to be blown up. Once idols are installed in mosques or dargahs, puja begins.
The state authorities succumb to political pressure. Gradually, the Islamic
character of the mosques is erased and symbols of Hinduism are inscribed.*

* *

*Often, state authorities disallow mosque construction if Hindus object. The
ban on mosque construction happens not only in remote villages but also in
the national capital. That, in sum, is the pattern and process of erasing
Islam, inscribing Hindutva to make India Islam-free.*

* *

*Proponents of Hindutva may hate Islam, but they emulate what they think are
their enemies’ ways.*

* *

*Hyderabad-born, MIT-based **Omar Khalidi is the author of Muslims in Indian
Economy, 2006, and Khaki and Ethnic Violence in India, 2010*

* *

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to