To clarify every Ram Mandir in Faizabad( Ayodhya ) it is claimed is
the site of the birth of Ram. Further according to Tulsidas, Ramchandraji
" Prakat hue" he was divinity  and hence  not born .....

With 20,000  Ram Mandirs consecrating their devotion  in
Faizabad( Ayodhya ) can it ever be said that the movement and 
its financiers led a genuine political/religious   movement . 

What the devotees read members of saffron party  did on their return
 in more than one state of the Indian  Union is well known .

The institutions of the Indian State are daily exposing their
competence and devotion to duty and the truth .

             Niloufer Bhagwat
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Niloufer Bhagwat 
  To: [email protected] ; gajendra singh 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 5:53 PM
  Subject: Re: Fw:"... The Kar Seva Movement and Silver Cutlery 



    Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:25 PM
    Subject: Re: Fw:"...legal sanction to a brazenly barbaric politics of 
majoritarianism." -teesta


     Since we have to laugh at ourselves and what we are doing  to
    this country and the nature of the discourse , it is necessary to state 
    that  a family member of one the political leaders who lead the movement 
    wrote in an affidavit  pursuant to a family dispute (which was being 
    circulated by members of the same political party, when faction infighting 
    took place  in the political party )that middle class and rich people out 
of 
     devotion and faith presented silver murtis of the deity  to the leader , 
which 
    were  later converted  into silver cutlery, as the family to whom they were 
    presented though a vital part of the movement to contruct the temple , 
    are not devotees of Ramchandraji .

      There are 20,000 Ram Mandirs in Faizabad( former Ayodhya)
    and many Masjids . The Mandirs all claim that Ram  was born on
    the site of the Mandir . 

    It is necessary to reclaim the  political and social space from
    tendentious discourse .

                             Niloufer Bhagwat
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Niloufer Bhagwat 
      To: [email protected] ; gajendra singh 
      Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 2:42 PM
      Subject: Re: Fw:"...legal sanction to a brazenly barbaric politics of 
majoritarianism." -teesta



       The real reason is not majoritarianism ,it is financial and political
      control over society which has led to the  distorted " Jehadi discourse"
      by banking interests and financiers and their touts  to justify seizure 
of 
      resources theworld over .As the people of Faizabad ( Ayodhya) inform 
everyone
      this is a dispute fanned by outsiders.

       Just as the village money lender with his upper caste/upper class 
alliance 
      needed the Dalits and other backward classes  as  flogging horses for the
       rapacious financial exploitation with untouchability and caste as a 
suitable social
       and economic diversion to justify control over village society and its 
economy 
      sanctioned by the spiritual mumbo jumbo of Brahminical rituals ;in the 
same way 
      those who control India 's economy and the world economy require a 
flogging horse
      in an attempt to divert attention from the theft of billions and 
trillions from
      the national budget by Bankers, Financiers and  private corporations  the 
world
      over .

      The 'jehadi discourse' commenced when several countries had to be invaded 
for
      capture of resources and within countries the national budget was to be
      diverted towards special interests and serves this purpose .

      This is not a majoritarian versus minority issue , this is creeping 
fascism
      which requires the demonisation of a whole community , to camouflage
      the economic and political attack on the savings and resources of a
      substantial section of society . Fascism as a political system requires
      the criminalization of the whole society .

       It is significant that the movement which finally resulted in the 
demolition of
      the Masjid commenced with IMF World Bank taking over governance in India
      through local collaborators . A massive diversion for the political 
change over.

      Systematically over two decades a villication campaign commenced singling 
out
      in the national newspapers and the media the Muslims as the new Dalits , 
the
      flogging horse ; the same justification which was used to justify 
untouchability
      before the arrival of Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. Ambedkar on the scene , both 
socialists,
      has now been used to resurrect historical myths to portray the Muslim 
community
      as the new untouchables with pogroms and attacks from time to time .

      The plots to overthrow by assassination and physical force India's first
      cabinet formed after 1947 , was an upper caste/upper class conspiracy
      against the  social and economic democratization which the upper 
castes/classes
      were of the opinion disturbed their hegemony over Indian society .

      There are several newspapers now hired for this task, all allied with 
finance
      capital local and global .The financiers of Mumbai made it their covert
      strategy, therefore it was not one party alone as disclosed by the Mumbai
      Pradesh Congress party workers , that their leaders had also been involved
      along with the saffron forces . The pogroms of Mumbai and Gujarat were to
      strengthen the control over these two State of the Western region and the
      national budget  by creating a new basis of loyalty ' Hindutva' which had 
also
       been used to create the two nation theory to assist British Imperialism  
to preserve 
      economic and political control over the Indian Subcontinent ; to  
consolidate
       the space taken over by well known business and commercial houses to 
camouflage
       that hereinafter the guiding principles of political and economic policy 
in these
      regions and other extended regions would be in  the interest of capital 
and
      their priorities .


      The historical fact is that Babar had lost his own kingdom and
      arrived in Afghanistan with a band of a few  hundreds of horsemen ,
      insufficient to conquer or defeat any country .It is the Rajputs who
       invited Babar to India ,this is an elementary historical fact .

        There is deliberate distortion of Indian history .The
        leading nobles in the Court of the Mughals were always
      Rajputs . India was never ruled exclusively by the Mughals,
       it was Mughal -Rajput rule . Even against the Maratha
      kingdom the Mughal armies were always led by Rajput generals.

        The control which the upper caste/ upper class elements have
      exercised over Indian society , is reflected in the refusal of the
      96 ruling Maratha clans supported by the Brahmins and upper
      castes  to crown Shivaji . India has had an informal reservation from 
      time immemorial in favour of the upper castes/upper classes which 
      Mahatma Gandhiand Dr. Ambedkar made it their political plank to bring 
      to an end.

      In respect of the attacks against so called outsiders in Mumbai
      ( when they are in their own country ) ,significantly there are no
      attacks against financiers and business houses who are not 
      Maharastrians , but against the poorest of the poor.The
      heads of business houses are not asked to address their 
      shareholders in Marathi or to print share forms and certificates 
      in Marathi .The attacks are always against the poorest migrants .

      There is complete silence as to how so many people
      of Maharashtrian origin are found in areas which
      are Hindi speaking , such as Madhya Pradesh in all
      major cities and in other parts of the country  including
      working and living in Arab countries which are so called
       " Jehadi countries ". 


      Unfortunately such  discourse and criminal  acts
      are leading  to the criminalization of a whole society
      since for  the execution of such violent , illegal 
      and covert acts, the entire machinery of the State has
      to be used in one form or another . Once officials
      succumb to becoming  instruments of criminality they
      cannot revert to honest administrative decisions .

      It is time to renew our pledge to the Constitution
      of India  and to the Rule of Law .The famous Buddhist 
      Emperor Ashok in his  edicts had observed that we 
      respect our own culture only when we  honour the culture
       of others .We have come a long way since then .The Khap 
      Panchayat and many other political organizations which routinely
      attack the poorest of the poor on the ground of cultural
      identity  remind us that there is no difference between us 
      and the Taliban . We can refer to these organizations as
      the" Talibanization " of Indian Society .

       The Buddha ,a great philosophical thinker an outstanding
      humanist who spent a life in the service of humanity ,
       had talked of a 'Middle Path' . We need a Middle Path
      in India to avoid  self destruction and disaster for all , even as
      erstwhile major financial centres of the world face imminent
      disaster and as  the criminalization of Indian society grows by
      leaps and bounds .

      A political, financial and  economic system which is leading
      to the financial and economic collapse of  the United States 
      cannot be our role model . In India 25% of GDP is already
      controlled by a few families and 100 billionaires are
       representatives of the Indian people in the Indian  Parliament . 

      Finally the Aryans are not the indigenous inhabitants of
      this country . Whereas the tribal people are the first people
      of this country ,whose resources are being presently seized
       without alternative livelihoods ,  in an attempt to devastate
      the ecology of  their regions by  rapacious mining by the 
      descendants of  the Aryan invaders who enslaved the country
      imposing their culture !!!!!!!!!

                           Niloufer Bhagwat

      From: sudhir devadas 
        To: badri raina ; NILOFER BHAGWAT ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
ram puniyani ; sashikumar ; unni shanker ; Fr. Cedric Prakash ; 
[email protected] ; Dunu Roy ; Yousuf ; diwaker balakrishnan ; 
Barkha Dutt (Delhi) ; [email protected] ; Kalpana Sharma (bombay) ; Ammu 
Joseph ; gauri lankesh ; rasheeda ; David Barsamian ; Surendra Cartoonist ; 
Justin Podur ; jake oo ; Petra Bergquist ; naoko yatani ; Paul Mathew 
        Cc: BRP Bhaskar ; basheer mm ; appukuttanv ; [email protected] ; 
NP Rajendran ; Chekkutty N.P ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
kamalram sajeev ; sethu sethu ; [email protected] ; geedha geedha ; Rathi 
Menon ; K.M.Seethi Seethi ; chundayil paul Zacharia ; Rajagopal. K ; S Faizi ; 
[email protected] ; soni sudha ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; Maleeha Raghaviah ; conicalhat ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; jayashree ; [email protected] ; C. R. Neelan ; madhu ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; Adv. A. Jayashanker ; [email protected] ; M P 
Basheer ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; nsreejith1 nsree ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; Deeju Sivadas ; 
[email protected] ; reji cartoon ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; hassankoya hassankoya ; [email protected] ; rk 
sreejith ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Expressindia ; 
bijura kochi ; Backer NA ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] 
        Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:02 PM
        Subject: Fw:"...legal sanction to a brazenly barbaric politics of 
majoritarianism." -teesta


        ----- Forwarded Message ----
        From: teesta setalvad <[email protected]>
        To: sudhir devadas <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]
        Sent: Tue, 5 October, 2010 2:09:34 PM
        Subject: 

        ((Sept 30 2010))
        While the cursory attempt of the Court to reconcile this dispute by 
dividing the land threeways may be welcome, a disturbing question remains.
        ...What was being decided here was the civil dispute over land 
ownership alone--not matters of faith-- while the two criminal cases over the 
illegal and unConstitutional demolition of the Babri Mosque on 6.12.1992, in 
full public view, provoked by political and religious leaders are still 
pending. How have the Judges justified their silence on the criminal acts of 
1992, acts that were bloody as they cost human lives apart from wilfully 
destorying a Mosque and 1949??
        What will the impact of this verdict be on what were clearly and 
blatantly a violent and illegal act?Related to this is the critical question, 
can and should Courts adjudicate on matters of faith? 


        I recall Baba Laldas' interviews in Raam Ke Naam, a film by Anand 
Patwardhan when he analysed the motives behind the movement, the kind of 
violence that led up to 6.1.2.1992. He was mysteriously killed in 1993...He was 
the Court appointed iMahant who's bodyguard was removed by the BJP government 
in Uttar Pradesh...His suspicious death has also gone judicially 
unaddressed...The Judgement has given legal sanction to a brazenly barbaric 
politics of majoritarianism.


        Teesta Setalvad, Mumbai 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to