The fact finding team has given its report that 17 persons killed were unarmed 
civilians who are Adivasi . Does that give us the right to seize their lands 
and resources and provoke them to clear villages targeted for elimination by 
MNCs and Corporate Houses . 

Every year malnutrition deaths of thousands of children  being reported in 
Adivasi regions in particular in Maharashtra and Odisha.

 Kindly read the reports on the  so called Chhattisgarh  encounter .

                Niloufer Bhagwat
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Niloufer Bhagwat 
  To: [email protected] ; ial central ; Admiral Bhagwat ; 
gajendra singh 
  Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 8:59 AM
  Subject: Re: [humanrights-movement:6086] On the recent Chhattisgarh 
'encounter'


   There must be an immediate independent investigation by a fact finding team 
of citizens  on the killings in Chhattisgarh , as the Court have said every 
encounter death must be registered and investigated .We do not maintain armed 
contingents  and pay taxes to maintain them for the killing of our citizens . 
More than one political party in the region has raised several questions on 
these killings . 

      The Indigenous people of India , the Adivasis , are entitled to just 
access to their land , produce and resources    and  are entititled to protect 
and preserve their civilization and culture as much as any other state or 
region in the country ;to plot their organized killing  to take over their land 
and resources with the assistance of outsiders, to deprive these regions of 
their own perspective of  development , is neither democratic nor 
constitutional, as the Constitution of India expressly forbids land alienation  
and seizure of resources of the Adivasis.

  It is necessary that those struggling for the political and economic rights 
of the Indigenous people and Dalits forge strong coalitions with other 
exploited classes and categories to expose their siege, if they are not to be 
isolated  . This  is what Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. Ambedkar would have mandated, 
intolerance of injustice and of  the loot of the State exchequer to deprive 
working people of access to the national budget , development , a scientific 
culture and preservation of civilization and  the ecology . They would have 
also  called for the disbanding  and abandoning of political formations waging 
a war against all  weaker sections  of society . 

      Democratic minded journalists  must break through this silence as has 
happened in this case , and voices of political formations and movements  from 
the region be heard in the national capital and all other regions.              
         


                                  Niloufer Bhagwat

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Brp Bhaskar 
    To: [email protected] ; [email protected] 
    Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 11:45 AM
    Subject: [humanrights-movement:6086] On the recent Chhattisgarh 'encounter'


    The Maoists are also Indians
    
http://blogs.rediff.com/mkbhadrakumar/2012/06/30/the-maoists-are-also-indians/
    By M. K. Bhadrakumar

    Independent India has been consistent in its approach to the million 
mutinies that threatened the country’s unity and integrity through the past six 
decades and more. That pattern is something like this: popular alienation is 
simply left unaddressed even if the root cause remains no great mystery and is 
possible to be tackled; sometimes the ruling party willfully exploits the 
alienation to suit the needs of electoral politics (Khalistan); the wounds 
inevitably fester over time; and, when the wound becomes septic the Indian 
state cauterizes it without any anesthesia so that the patient freaks out with 
pain and the horrific memory of state brutality would, hopefully, linger for 
ever and teach a lesson.  
    But the wound as such is never healed. J&K and the northeastern states are 
still under army occupation. Isn’t there some other way to handle political 
alienation in the 21st century? India prides itself to be a country with a 
difference in the world community as a nation of moral stature. In the 
international forums, it is losing shyness and has begun taking up open 
positions on human rights and human security — for example, on Sri Lanka and 
Syria in the UNHRC in Geneva in the recent months. It frequently speaks out at 
the UN Security Council debates — be it on Sudan or Afghanistan. These are of 
course only appropriate for an ambitious, aspiring regional power. 
    And, yet, India’s own track record continues to remain dismal. The Indian 
state’s “biggest encounter” with the Maoists in the jungles of Chhattisgarh on 
Friday once again highlights the tragedy of the situation. Some evidence is 
surfacing that the Indian security forces went on a rampage in the remote 
jungle villages massacring civilians in the heat of the night of 
Thursday/Friday.
    The 19 Maoists killed included a 15-year old girl, while not more than two 
amongst the 19 killed could be identified as left extremists. If so, who were 
the remaining 17 dead souls? 
    To be sure, Home Minister P Chidambaram is utterly preoccupied with Hafiz 
Saeed. Hopefully, if and when he is done with that, we may know what happened. 
The security people admit that “a few innocent villagers could have died in 
crossfire.” Pray, how few is “few”?  
    The most shocking thing is that the Indian political class across the board 
has had nothing to say. They are preoccupied with the election of India’a next 
president — or with the “reforms”. When 19 citizens get killed by their 
country’s security forces, in any civilised country in the second decade of the 
21st century, some political commotion could be expected. But, not in India? 
The silence of the politicians points at the terrible weakening of the moral 
fibre of the Indian nation. 
    The most reprehensible aspect is the deafening silence of the established 
parties of the Indian Left who are, arguably, on the same ideological spectrum 
as the Maoists. Alright, the Maoists are rebels who got disillusioned with the 
Left establishment and bourgeois democracy, but they never ceased to be 
believers in the ideology. China can disowned them, but how could the Indian 
Left? 
    In fact, the Maoists’ presence in parts of India where the established Left 
doesn’t even exist shows that they have a legitimacy and credibility of their 
own which the established Left lacks in very large tracts of the most 
impoverished regions of our country that are inherently open to the egalitarian 
ideals of communism. An enlightened Left leadership would have sought to 
dialogue with these misguided elements — and a good starting point would be to 
commiserate with the 19 dead “comrades” in Chhattisgarh. Give them at least a 
decent burial. 

    M.K. Bhadrakumar is a retired career diplomat


    -- 
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
    For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to