Great news and write up as well, subhas,
On 13 Mar 2017 10:56, "Subhash Gatade" <[email protected]> wrote:

> New Socialist Initiative (NSI) congratulates the students' struggle in
> winning the battle against corporate publishers
> On 9 March 2017 three well-established academic corporate publishing
> houses, Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press and Taylor and
> Francis withdrew their copyright suit filed in the High Court against Delhi
> University and Rameshwari Photocopy Shop, a shop stationed at the Delhi
> School of Economics campus in Delhi University licensed by the University
> to carry out photocopying work. The suit that was filed in August 2012 on
> the grounds that photocopying material from books published by the above
> three publishers by university students, particularly in the compilation of
> coursepacks, constituted copyright infringement and revenue loss to the
> publishers. Right from the beginning it was clear this case was treated as
> a test case to instate a licensing regime, much like one that exists in the
> US and other First World countries.
>
> Being the absolute primary constituency to be impacted by such a case and
> its possible outcomes, students of Delhi University were amongst the first
> to take up the battle against some of the most powerful publishing houses
> in academia. The 'Campaign to Save D.School Photocopy Shop' soon became the
> 'Association of Students for Equitable Access to Knowledge' (ASEAK),
> reflecting the growing politicisation of the student community on the issue
> of the knowledge commons in order to resist an increasing attempt across
> the world to create a market out of it where it didn't as yet exist. This
> can be seen in the case of Costa Rica as well where there was an attempt to
> make photocopying illegal, a move that was successfully opposed on a
> massive scale by students.
>
> The students of Delhi University, organised as ASEAK, opposed the move
> through a range of mechanisms, mobilising students from class to class,
> organising public meetings, taking out protest rallies, campaigning against
> these publishers at the annual World Book Fair held in New Delhi,
> influencing public opinion through writing in newspapers, and last but not
> the least, taking up the legal battle in the courts. NSI hails the struggle
> of the students that brought to the centre of the debate questions of
> equity and justice within the arena of production and distribution of
> knowledge resources, challenging the private property regime sought to be
> implemented in the sphere of knowledge production by these big academic
> corporate publishing houses.
>
> For the last few years the primary site of the battle has been in the High
> Court at New Delhi. The publishers have received repeated blow after blow
> in this process as well, leading to their final withdrawal of the suit
> altogether. The win is a big victory and testament to the struggle of the
> students, backed by a legal team that has been seminal to the victory,
> along with support from the academic community. The case, that attempted to
> strike a 'balance' between private profits of the publishers and the rights
> of students to access materials in the pursuit of their education, has
> dealt a blow to precisely such a misconception that the two 'interests' are
> in fact of equal concern.
>
> Along with students, who assert their right over the materials they access
> as part of their fundamental right to education, scholars, often the
> authors of these materials, have equally come out to state that there is no
> better reward for their work as intellectuals, as to be read by as many
> students as can get hold of their work, photocopied or otherwise. The
> emphasis of the corporate publishers in asserting absolute ownership over
> the works they publish, in a rare instance where the labour of writing a
> book is provided at no cost to the publishers, borne by universities,
> students' fees and taxpayers' money instead, is shameful and needs to be
> rejected at all cost.
>
> NSI congratulates the students, lawyers, academics and concerned citizens
> who persisted in their resistance against the bullying tactics of big
> academic corporate publishing houses and calls on the academic community to
> engage with new ways of producing and sharing knowledge so as to create
> equitable, just and democratic structures of knowledge production.
>
> *EDUCATION OVER COPYRIGHT! KNOWLEDGE OVER PROFIT!*
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "humanrights movement" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to