*Modinama*

Issues That Did Not Matter

-subhash gatade



*Preface*: *Modi 2*.

*The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the
new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms
appear (Antonio Gramsci, Prison Notebooks, 1930).*

Narendra Damodardas Modi, the man who began his political journey as a
*Pracharak* of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), has been re-elected
Prime Minister of India. This is the first time that a right-wing Hindutva
government has been able to return to power. The last right-wing Hindutva
government (1998-2004) was voted out of office. Modi’s party – the
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) – and his bloc – the National Democratic
Alliance (NDA) – have garnered more seats and a higher vote share than they
did in 2014. Amongst the parliamentarians of the BJP there will be not one
Muslim, the largest religious minority in India (with a population of over
200 million people).

Amartya Sen, the Nobel laureate, had said that India has taken a ‘Quantum
jump in the wrong direction since 2014’. The very idea of India, Sen and
others said, was at stake in this election. This was set aside, as almost
one in two Indians who voted chose a party of the NDA. The enthusiasm, the
vigour, the frenzy exhibited by the supporters of the BJP and the NDA is an
indication that they are fascinated by the ‘New India’ of Modi, a new India
with new icons that have little resemblance to the India that emerged out
of the freedom movement.

The results of the Lok Sabha election of 2019 have shocked many, but the
signs that pointed towards them had become clear. Modi and the BJP held
tightly to the levers of power. Their commitment to the principles and
values of the Indian Constitution is formal. They have no qualms about
subverting the institutional checks and balances forged by the drafters of
the Constitution. They are interested in recasting the Republic of India
into a state that belongs to the majority religion, and to render invisible
a numerically significant minority. They demonise the ‘internal enemy’,
whether it be the religious minority or the political dissenter. They
peddle a myth that India equals Hindu India – being no less than the vision
of the RSS and its affiliates. Modi and the BJP have been able to create a
broad constituency that cuts across the barriers of caste and region,
promoted by state power and by the sprawling network of affiliated
organisations of the Sangh Parivar. This constituency fuelled the
re-election of Modi – more Modi than anything.

Is it enough to say that India is caught between its secular past and its
communal future? This book, based on a look at the first five years of
Modi’s reign, goes beyond that dichotomy. Even in the secular past there
were trends of social hierarchy and religious intolerance that Modi was
able to elaborate upon. The idea of the ‘external enemy’ and the ‘arch
rival’, the easy way in which jingoism could be mobilised around the
Pulawama terror attack, the surrender of the war-mongering embedded media –
all this shows the depth of the rot.

When the dust settles people will analyse how the elections were influenced
by the rapid spread of social media – especially WhatsApp groups – and by
the amount of money spent on the election. All this is true. But the media
and money were only successful because they were able to inflame right-wing
sentiments that had been cultivated by the Sangh Parivar over the past
several decades. Voices of moderation and inclusion were silenced. Issues
of life and livelihood – including the distress of farmers, unemployment,
inflation – had no traction.

It is a time of deep introspection for the opposition – from the regional
parties to the Left, as well as the civil society organisations. All those
who yearn for a plural and inclusive India have to think about why the
conversations of life and livelihood did not dominate the election; why the
thuggery of the Hindutva vigilantes seems inconsequential to vast numbers
of ordinary, decent people; why an aggressive, masculine fundamentalism is
so normalised in our society today.

In other words, why didn’t the issues that matter, seem to matter?

Was it money and the media or was there a higher barrier? To some extent
the answer can be found in the fragmentation of the opposition, with
insufficient alliances built in key parts of the country. But the question
we have raised goes deeper than electoral arithmetic. It asks if Modi and
the BJP have not only changed the electoral map, but also begun to corrode
social norms.

In his first speech after the 2019 election, Modi said he would uphold the
Constitution. The five years of his first tenure have demonstrated quite
visibly the great hiatus which has existed between what he claims and what
he does. It would be height of innocence that the coming period will be any
different. This book, based on a journey through Modi’s first five years as
Prime Minister, is a warning for the next five.

00000000000000000

Subhash Gatade is a left activist and author. He is the author of *Charvak
ke Vaaris* (Hindi, 2018), *Ambedkar ani Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh* (Marathi,
2016), *Godse’s Children: Hindutva Terror in India* (2011) and *The Saffron
Condition* (2011). His writings for children include *Pahad Se Uncha Aadmi*
 (2010).

978-81-934666-9-8

LeftWord Books,
<https://mayday.leftword.com/publisher/post/leftword-books?___store=in> New
Delhi, 2019

Language: English

128 pages, 5.5″ x 8.5″

Price INR 195.00 Book Club Price INR 137.00

(https://mayday.leftword.com/catalog/product/view/id/21450)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/humanrights-movement/CAJGPqcY8cDafxeSTun33zoOQwf8xiBovhGHxsua41ftAhO4UmA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to