Samuel Thibault, le Wed 23 Sep 2009 23:51:30 +0200, a écrit : > Also, dynamic-size cpuset_t is actually more efficient for small boxes > for most operations, as the bitmask will be smaller.
As raised in another thread, dynamic-size cpuset_t could also permit a sparse implementation for really big boxes (100 000 cores). Just to be clear: I'm not concerned by the ABI we choose right now, as I believe recompiling to get better support is not a problem for people. I'm concerned by the needed API changes, i.e. providing functions to allocate/copy/destroy cpusets so that later ABI changes don't require a change in the API. Samuel
