On Oct 7, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> One comment, I see that you have a
> hwloc_cpuset_copy (which I would have called duplicate)
> but copy in the sense of assignment is not really possible (i.e.
> reusing an existing allocated cpuset, and initialize it with the
> content of another.
I need to think about this.
Can we cite any common cases where "copy" is used instead of
"duplicate"? "copy" is certainly shorter. :-)
MPI has MPI_COMM_DUP, MPI_TYPE_DUP ("dup", not "duplicate").
If we don't like the verb "copy", how about "clone"?
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
