I wouldn't say no to the ability to flatten Misc / NUMA. As to the current issue though, does my patch look acceptable? Thanks.
Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, le Fri 20 Nov 2009 15:54:43 +0100, a écrit : >> Introduce several numagroup types? How many? That's not easy to >> answer. > > Or maybe we can add an "ignore" configuration function that also takes a > pair of depth parameters to ignore a range of depths for a given type. > Here you would ignore the NUMA level and the NUMAGROUP depths different > from the one you're interested in, and this also permits to e.g. ignore > the L1 and L2 caches but not the L3 cache, etc. > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > hwloc-devel mailing list > hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel -- Michael A. Raymond Message Passing Toolkit Team Silicon Graphics Inc (651) 683-3434
